DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No: 04892-12
27 March 2013
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To? Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW. OF NAVAL OF RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting a change in her RE-4 (not recommended for
retention) reentry code, that was issued on 27 December 2010.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Bianchi, Ms. Trucco, and Mr.
Hedrick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 26 March 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed ina timely manner.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active duty on 17 March 2004. She served over six years without
disciplinary action, was awarded two Navy and Marine Corps
Achievement Medals, a Good Conduct Medal, was advanced to petty
officer second class, and her evaluations reflect generally
Satisfactory performance.
d. On 27 December 2010, Petitioner signed an enlisted
performance evaluation for the period 16 March to 27 December
2010 in which she was not recommended for advancement or
retention. That evaluation assigned adverse marks in the
category of military bearing, but satisfactory marks in all other
categories. The evaluation also notes that she was unable to
participate in physical readiness due to pregnancy, and was
unable to meet one or more physical readiness standards. She was
honorably discharged on 27 December 2010. At that time, she was
assigned an RE-4 reentry code. In this regard, the reentry code
of RE-4 means that she is not recommended for reenlistment.
However, she could have been assigned a code of RE-3F, meaning
that she failed to meet established physical readiness standards
per prescribed Navy regulations.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
In this regard, the Board notes Petitioner's overall record of
military service, including over six years of honorable service
without any disciplinary infractions. Further, she was advanced
in rate to second class petty officer and awarded two Navy and
Marine Corps Achievement Medals and a Good Conduct Medal. The
Board therefore concludes that no useful purpose is served by
assignment of the most restrictive reentry code of RE-4, and
assignment of the RE-3F more accurately reflects the quality of
her service. The RE-3F reentry code may not prohibit
reenlistment, but requires that a waiver be obtained from
recruiting personnel who are responsible for reviewing the
feasibility of satisfying the Navy’s personnel manning goals by
determining whether or not an individual meets the standards for
reenlistment. If she wishes to reenlist, re-affiliate, or be
reinstated in the Navy, she would need to contact the Navy
Recruiting Command via her nearest recruiting facility. In view
of the above, the Board directs the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 27 December 2010, she was issued an RE-3F reentry code vice
the RE-4 actually issued on that date.
b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
c. That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner’s application was received on 2 May
2012.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Fs, aga a [———
ROBERT D. SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07364-08
On 31 July 1995, Petitioner was honorably discharged from active duty and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. In this regard, the reenlistment code of RE-4 means that she is not recommended for reenlistment. The Board therefore concludes that no useful purpose is served by assignment of the most restrictive reenlistment code of RE-4, and the RE-3F code more accurately reflects the quality of her service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00502-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 00502-11 18 Octeber 2011 -From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (Qi: Ref: (a) 100.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention} reentry code. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07180-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marines Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr and Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08175-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 18 October 2005 Petitioner was issued an RE-3F reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code actually issued on that date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04321-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 04321-09 29 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iil Ref: (a) 10 0.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. d. With his application, Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09219-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 09219-07 17 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ty Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board, consisting of Say ena, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01703-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Reference (c), however, authorizes the issuance of an RE-3F reenlistment code for a Sailor, such as Petitioner, who was not recommended for retention due to PFA failures. That Petitioner's naval record be further corrected to show that she was recommended for reenlistment on 8 April 1996 vice not being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11839-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJN Docket No: 11839-09 30 August 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 16 U:S.¢., 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00078-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 00078-08 11 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW _OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. Although the record reflects that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11879-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 11879-08 28 October 20039 From: Chairman, .Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF MAVAL RECORD OF (U0 Ref: (a) 10 U.§.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) wath...